Legal Opinion
City of Virginia Beach v. Nala Corp.
Norfolk County Circuit Court
Decided September 29, 2000No. Case No. (Chancery) C99-450-02PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
By Judge Charles E. Poston
Today the Court holds that its order of January 13, 1995, appointing a receiver for Virginia Beach Holding Corporation, should be vacated because it was procured by the fraud of the defendants Edwin B. Lindsley, Jr., and Nala Corporation and that the deed given by the receiver thereby appointed should be declared null and void. The Court also holds that none of the defendants owns or has any interest, through Soames Corporation, in land east of the platted lots between 5th Street and Rudee Inlet in the City of Virginia Beach. The court has considered the evidence…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Shively v. BowlbySupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Johnson & Graham's Lessee v. McIntoshSupreme Court of the United States · 1823
- Dewitt Truck Brokers, Inc. v. W. Ray Flemming Fruit Company and W. Ray FlemmingCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1976
- Prospect Development Co. v. BershaderSupreme Court of Virginia · 1999
- Cheatle v. Rudd's Swimming Pool Supply Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1987
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Fala Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
- Fala Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
- Harshaw v. Bethany Christian ServicesDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2010
- Fala Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
- In re Virginia Beach Holding Corp.Virginia Circuit Court · 2003
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.