Legal Opinion
In Re Downstream Addicks and Barker (Texas) Flood-Control Reservoirs v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided August 21, 2020No. 17-9002Published
1Opinion of the Court
In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 17-9002 Filed: August 21, 2020 ) IN RE DOWNSTREAM ADDICKS ) AND BARKER (TEXAS) ) FLOOD-CONTROL RESERVOIRS ) Fifth Amendment Taking; Motion to ) Voluntarily Dismiss; RCFC 41(a)(2); Test ) Property; Dismissal with Prejudice. THIS DOCUMENT APPLIES TO: ) ) No. 17-1191 ) ) Bryant S. Banes, Neel, Hooper & Banes, PC, Houston, TX, for plaintiffs. Kristine Sears Tardiff, U.S. Department of Justice, Environment & Natural Resources Division, for defendant. OPINION AND ORDER SMITH, Senior Judge Before the Court is plaintiff Timothy Stahl’s Motion for…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Fisher v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Rick's Mishroom Service, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
- Betty v. Pace, as Administratrix of the Estate of Floyd J. Pace, Jr., Deceased v. Southern Express CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1969
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.