Legal Opinion
Klamath Irrigation District v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided May 14, 2014No. 1:01-cv-00591PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION and ORDER
ALLEGRA, Judge:
Plaintiffs seek to dismiss their Third Claim for Relief, without prejudice, in accordance with RCFC 41(a)(2).
Plaintiffs initially brought this case in 2001, seeking just compensation under the Fifth Amendment and damages for a breach of the Klamath Basin Compact. On March 24, 2003, plaintiffs filed their first amended complaint, adding a breach of contract claim. In 2005, the court entered summary judgment in favor of defendant on the takings and Klamath Compact claims. Klamath Irr. Dist. v. United States, 67 Fed.Cl. 504 (2005). In 2007, the court entered…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- In Re Paoli Railroad Yard Pcb LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Tohono O’odham NationSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Grover v. Eli Lilly & Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
- Beth B. Pontenberg v. Boston ScientificCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2001
- Elbaor v. Tripath Imaging, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Bradley v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2020
- DAVID & KAREN BROWN REVOCABLE LIVING TRUST v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2025
- Humphries v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2021
- In Re Downstream Addicks and Barker (Texas) Flood-Control Reservoirs v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2020
- In Re Downstream Addicks and Barker (Texas) Flood-Control Reservoirs v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2020
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.