Persyn v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
MOODY R. TIDWELL, III, Judge:
This matter is before the court on defendant’s motion for Judgment on Partial Findings, pursuant to RCFC 52(c), made at the close of plaintiffs’ case, on all thirty-four claims of an avigation easement by physical taking from overflights of aircraft from Kelly Air Force Base (KAFB or Kelly) in San Antonio, Texas. For the reasons set forth below, the court grants defendant’s motion, and dismisses the complaint.1 In a related *190Order issued today, counsel for plaintiffs is ordered to show cause why he should not be sanctioned for his actions at trial. The court…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- United States v. CausbySupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Brady v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Gonzalez-McCaulley Investment Group, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
- City of Austin v. Travis County Landfill Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2002
- Cohen v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Alfa Laval Separation, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1998
- Carole v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.