Legal Opinion

Draper v. Hellman Commercial Trust & Savings Bank

California Supreme Court

Decided January 3, 1928No. Docket No. L.A. 7895PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

This is an appeal by defendant, Hellman Commercial Trust and Savings Bank, a corporation, from a judgment awarding plaintiff $10,000 as damages for the publication by defendant of alleged libelous communications concerning plaintiff. A judgment providing for $15,000 as compensatory damages and $5,000 as exemplary damages was originally entered upon the verdict of the jury, but thereafter defendant moved for a new trial, which was denied upon plaintiff’s filing with the court a written consent to the reduction of the total amount of damages from $20,000 to $10,000. The court…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Zibbell v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Davis v. HearstCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Snively v. Record Publishing Co.California Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Chavez v. Times-Mirror Co.California Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Doolin v. Omnibus Cable Co.California Supreme Court · 1899

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Lipman v. Brisbane Elementary School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Phelan v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Sanborn v. Chronicle Publishing Co.California Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Kern v. HettingerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
  5. Noble v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1973

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API