Sanborn v. Chronicle Publishing Co.
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
RICHARDSON, J.
In this case we are presented with questions involving the liability of defendants City and County of ¿an Francisco (City) and its clerk, Mártin Mongan (Mongan), for defamation arising from Mongan’s statements to the news media explaining his release to plaintiff of funds which had been deposited with Mongan. Concluding as we do that at the time of his statements Mongan was acting within the scope of his employment and that neither immunity nor privilege enfolded City or Mongan, plaintiff’s judgment against both defendants following jury verdict is affirmed.
We affirm the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Barr v. MatteoSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Denham v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Johnson v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Estate of McDillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Ramos v. County of MaderaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by93 opinions
- Taus v. LoftusCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
- Caldwell v. MontoyaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Lundquist v. ReusserCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- Barner v. LeedsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
- Kilgore v. YoungerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
88 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.