Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Noble v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 25, 1973No. Civ. 40771PublishedCited by 69 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KINGSLEY, J.

Plaintiff Noble sued Sears, Roebuck and Co., Sears’ attorneys, Sam Pruitt Investigations, and certain persons working for Sam Pruitt Investigations, charging 10 counts. The 10 counts alleged: Trespass; battery; fraud; negligently caused physical, mental and emotional injuries; invasion of attorney-client relationship; invasion of privacy; negligent entrustment of agents (two counts); conspiracy; violation of statutory duties; and violation of attorneys’ ethics. We are here concerned only with the counts which charged respondents. Sears and its attorneys, namely the fifth;…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Albertson v. RaboffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Forster v. ManchesterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  3. Taylor v. Oakland Scavenger Co.California Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Gudger v. MantonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Maloney v. RathCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by69 opinions

  1. Hill v. National Collegiate Athletic Assn.California Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Mozzochi v. BeckSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  3. Shulman v. Group W Productions, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1998
  4. William H. Traver v. David MeshriyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
  5. Miller v. National Broadcasting Co.California Court of Appeal · 1986

64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API