Legal Opinion

Kern v. Tracy

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 28, 1995No. Nos. 94-788 and 94-789PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

The following issues are presented: (1) Did the BTA err in ruling that appellants had failed to establish the various claimed exemptions? (2) Was the issue of exemption under R.C. 5739.02(B)(14) for the sale of ships or vessels used or to be used principally in interstate commerce properly before this *349court, in light of the fact that the issue was not included in appellants’ notices of appeal to the BTA or to this court? (3) Was the commissioner’s refusal to remit the statutory penalties an abuse of discretion?

As to the first issue, the BTA rejected appellants’ claims because of failure to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hatchadorian v. LindleyOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Jennings & Churella Construction Co. v. LindleyOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Federated Department Stores, Inc. v. LindleyOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Frankelite Co. v. LindleyOhio Supreme Court · 1986

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Satullo v. WilkinsOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Cousino Construction Co. v. WilkinsOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Skuratowicz v. TracyOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Defender Sec. Co. v. TestaOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
  5. In re Allied Consol. Indus., Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 2019

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API