Federated Department Stores, Inc. v. Lindley
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
The primary focus throughout this appeal has been on whether the tax assessment predicated on “Account 215” was valid. For the *215following reasons, this court holds that the board’s decision, that the assessment based on this account was invalid, was neither unlawful nor unreasonable.
Rike’s has argued that Account 215 was only an estimate of sales tax liability and thus could not be used as the basis of an assessment. Contrastingly, the commissioner has argued that R.C. 5739.13 authorizes an assessment upon “any information” that a vendor is not remitting to the state all of the sales tax that…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hawthorn Mellody, Inc. v. LindleyOhio Supreme Court · 1981
- Citizens Financial Corp. v. PorterfieldOhio Supreme Court · 1971
- Episcopal Parish of Christ Church v. KinneyOhio Supreme Court · 1979
- 3535 Salem Corp. v. LindleyOhio Supreme Court · 1979
- Midwest Transfer Co. v. PorterfieldOhio Supreme Court · 1968
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- American Fiber Systems, Inc. v. LevinOhio Supreme Court · 2010
- Standards Testing Laboratories, Inc. v. ZainoOhio Supreme Court · 2003
- Global Knowledge Training, L.L.C. v. LevinOhio Supreme Court · 2010
- Nusseibeh v. ZainoOhio Supreme Court · 2003
- Shiloh Automotive, Inc. v. LevinOhio Supreme Court · 2008
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.