Legal Opinion

Satullo v. Wilkins

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided November 29, 2006No. 2006-0046PublishedCited by 132 opinions

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} The appellants, S. Sandy Satullo II and Copper Kettle Marina, Inc., argue in this appeal as of right that they do not owe Ohio use tax for their use of two boats between November 1, 1995, and October 31, 1999. The Board of Tax Appeals (“BTA”) found that the state Tax Commissioner had properly imposed a use tax on the appellants. According to the BTA, the appellants did not purchase the boats with the intent to resell them, and therefore the R.C. 5739.01(E) resale exception to the sales and use tax did not apply. The BTA likewise rejected the appellants’ request for a tax exemption under…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Andrew Gerardo v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
  2. Board of Education v. ZainoOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  3. American National Can Co. v. TracyOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Citizens Financial Corp. v. PorterfieldOhio Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Columbus City School District Board of Education v. ZainoOhio Supreme Court · 2001

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by132 opinions

  1. Akron Centre Plaza Ltd. Liability Co. v. Summit County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Worthington City Schools Board of Education v. Franklin County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 2009
  3. HealthSouth Corp. v. TestaOhio Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Olmsted Falls Board of Education v. Cuyahoga County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Sapina v. Cuyahoga County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 2013

127 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API