Legal Opinion
Frankelite Co. v. Lindley
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided December 19, 1986No. 86-563PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Per curiam
I
In his sole proposition of law, the Tax Commissioner seeks reversal of the board’s remission of the penalty. In this regard, the board held:
“The Board of Tax Appeals finds that in this particular case, the appellant [Frankelite] has sufficiently shown that the failure to remit the penalty was an abuse of discretion. Frankelite had an established history of timely filing and payment of sales tax returns. Frankelite maintained an extensive file of exemption certificates and manifested a good faith reliance on them. Frankelite fully cooperated with the tax agents during the audit and undertook…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Jennings & Churella Construction Co. v. LindleyOhio Supreme Court · 1984
- Condee v. LindleyOhio Supreme Court · 1984
- Beatrice Foods Co. v. LindleyOhio Supreme Court · 1982
- McLean Trucking Co. v. LindleyOhio Supreme Court · 1982
- Union Metal Mfg. Co. v. KosydarOhio Supreme Court · 1974
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- J.M. Smucker, L.L.C. v. LevinOhio Supreme Court · 2007
- Kern v. TracyOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- Kilbarger Construction, Inc. v. LimbachOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- Southwestern Portland Cement Co. v. LimbachOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- AT&T Technologies, Inc. v. LimbachOhio Supreme Court · 1994
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.