Legal Opinion

Cousino Construction Co. v. Wilkins

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 1, 2006No. 2004-1560PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAlice Robie Resnick, J.

{¶ 1} We are asked to decide in this appeal as of right whether Cousino Construction Company owes use taxes on its use of services provided by professional cleaners who removed soot, dirt, and odors from buildings that Cousino reconstructed and restored.

{¶ 2} The Tax Commissioner and the Board of Tax Appeals (“BTA”) found that Cousino used or consumed taxable janitorial services and did not resell those services to others. The BTA ruled that the R.C. 5739.01(E) resale exception to the sales and use tax therefore did not apply. We affirm the decision of the BTA on those issues, which are the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Board of Education v. ZainoOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  2. American National Can Co. v. TracyOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Columbus City School District Board of Education v. ZainoOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  4. MCI Telecommunications Corp. v. LimbachOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Lenart v. LindleyOhio Supreme Court · 1980

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Satullo v. WilkinsOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Newman v. LevinOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Brown v. LevinOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Ohio Bell Telephone Co. v. LevinOhio Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Lovell v. LevinOhio Supreme Court · 2007

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API