Legal Opinion

Jennings & Churella Construction Co. v. Lindley

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 11, 1984No. 82-1481PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLocher, J.

The instant case presents two issues for our consideration: (1) whether appellant taxpayer is liable for use taxes assessed upon the purchase price of bathroom-kitchen modules utilized in appellant’s construction of an apartment building, and (2) whether appellee Tax Commissioner abused *69his discretion in only partially remitting a statutory penalty imposed pursuant to R.C. 5739.13. We find for appellee on both issues.

The first issue requires a determination of the effect of the words: “* * * a construction contract pursuant to which tangible personal property is or is to be incorporated * *…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. AdamsOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Chester Township v. Geauga County Budget CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Botkins Grain & Feed Co. v. LindleyOhio Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Servomation Corp. v. KosydarOhio Supreme Court · 1976

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Black v. Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1985
  2. J.M. Smucker, L.L.C. v. LevinOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Kemppel v. ZainoOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  4. General Motors Corp. v. TracyOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Frankelite Co. v. LindleyOhio Supreme Court · 1986

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API