Legal Opinion

Holmes v. Holmes

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 11, 1902PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from Branch; Yaple, J. Bill by Nathaniel L. Holmes and Mary L. Galloway against Sarah E. Holmes and others to foreclose a mortgage. From a decree for complainants, defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.

Complainants’ grandfather died intestate, owning .personal property valued at upwards of $168,000, and real estate valued at $25,000, leaving a widow, Mary Holmes, 77 years old, and four children. Upon a settlement of the estate, Mary Holmes transferred to the children all her interest, both real and personal, in the estate of her husband, and took in return four mortgages, one from each of the children, each “to secure the payment of the sum of five thousand dollars, * * * the receipt whereof is hereby confessed and acknowledged, in manner following, to wit: Interest annually at seven per…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Phelps v. AbbottMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Green v. LangdonMichigan Supreme Court · 1873
  3. Dunham v. W. Steele Packing & Provision Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1894

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Baltes v. KliefWisconsin Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Sheffler v. ShermanMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Croxton v. BarrowCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1937
  4. Lamkin v. Robinson, Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Hamilton County1910
  5. Leggett v. DavisonMichigan Supreme Court · 1902

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API