Legal Opinion

Sheffler v. Sherman

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 29, 1911No. Docket No. 114PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error to Missaukee; Lamb, J. Replevin by Thurlow M. Sheffler against Minnie Sherman for certain cattle. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtBrooke, J.

Plaintiff brought replevin to secure possession of two cows and a bull. April 13, 1908, defendant was the owner of two other cows and the bull in question. On that day the three head of cattle passed into the possession of plaintiff, and he gave to defendant a promissory note for $68, accompanied by a chattel mortgage covering the cattle and a horse. The note and mortgage were absolute upon their face and ran for one year. In September, 1908, plaintiff butchered the two cows, and with the proceeds of their sale secured two others. On December 3, 1908, he executed a new note and mortgage, also…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Phelps v. AbbottMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Central Savings Bank v. O'ConnorMichigan Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Cook v. BrownMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Dunham v. W. Steele Packing & Provision Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Hyde v. TenwinkelMichigan Supreme Court · 1872

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Solomon v. StewartMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Foley v. Grand Rapids & Indiana Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Price v. KlettMichigan Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Cooper v. SonkMichigan Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Diamant v. ChestnutMichigan Supreme Court · 1918

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API