Legal Opinion

Lamkin v. Robinson

Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Hamilton County

Decided June 15, 1910PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtHunt, J.

The Pleadings.

These two actions were tried together. The several plaintiffs are daughters of John F. Robinson, the defendant. The controversy arises in regard to the proceeds and dividends of certain stock originally known as the Russell & Morgan stock, hereinafter more particularly described, which stock defendant, as guardian of plaintiffs, had received from the estate of plaintiffs’ mother, defendant’s wife,, and to which defendant • claims to have had an equitable title at the time of the mother’s death, and now claims a life interest by reason of agreements or declarations of trust made…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Wood v. CarpenterSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  2. Towson v. MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  3. Cook v. BradleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1828
  4. Jenkins v. PyeSupreme Court of the United States · 1838
  5. Pusey v. GardnerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1883

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Robinson v. LamkinOhio Superior Court, Cincinnati · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API