Legal Opinion

Phelps v. Abbott

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 22, 1897PublishedCited by 29 opinions

Error to Lapeer; Moore, J. Assumpsit by Edwin Phelps against John Abbott upon a promissory note. Prom a judgment for defendant, plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.

Plaintiff and defendant were, in 1886 and 1887, -both breeders of blooded cattle. The plaintiff resided near Pontiac, and the defendant at Lapeer. In April, 1887, plaintiff had a public sale of stock at Pontiac, at which defendant was a bidder, and became the purchaser of a cow and calf at $300, and a heifer for $195. After the sale, defendant gave his note to plaintiff for the sum of $495, due in one year, the note being in the usual form of a negotiable promissory note. Shortly thereafter the heifer was returned, and the purchase price, $195, credited on the note. This action is brought to…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Burnes v. ScottSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Kulenkamp v. GroffMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Martin v. HamlinMichigan Supreme Court · 1869
  4. Cook v. BrownMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Hyde v. TenwinkelMichigan Supreme Court · 1872

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Central Savings Bank v. O'ConnorMichigan Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Cleveland Refining Co. v. DunningMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Solomon v. StewartMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Crowley v. LangdonMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Frischkorn Real Estate Co. v. HoskinsMichigan Supreme Court · 1924

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API