Phelps v. Abbott
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Lapeer; Moore, J. Assumpsit by Edwin Phelps against John Abbott upon a promissory note. Prom a judgment for defendant, plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.
Plaintiff and defendant were, in 1886 and 1887, -both breeders of blooded cattle. The plaintiff resided near Pontiac, and the defendant at Lapeer. In April, 1887, plaintiff had a public sale of stock at Pontiac, at which defendant was a bidder, and became the purchaser of a cow and calf at $300, and a heifer for $195. After the sale, defendant gave his note to plaintiff for the sum of $495, due in one year, the note being in the usual form of a negotiable promissory note. Shortly thereafter the heifer was returned, and the purchase price, $195, credited on the note. This action is brought to…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Burnes v. ScottSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Kulenkamp v. GroffMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
- Martin v. HamlinMichigan Supreme Court · 1869
- Cook v. BrownMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
- Hyde v. TenwinkelMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Central Savings Bank v. O'ConnorMichigan Supreme Court · 1903
- Cleveland Refining Co. v. DunningMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
- Solomon v. StewartMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
- Crowley v. LangdonMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
- Frischkorn Real Estate Co. v. HoskinsMichigan Supreme Court · 1924
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.