Legal Opinion

Altman & Co. v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided December 4, 1925No. 2624PublishedCited by 75 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGraham, Presiding Judge

B. Altman & Co. imported, in 1923, certain merchandise which they entered as cotton wearing apparel. The consular invoice described the merchandise as “ Untrimmed cotton corsets” and, “Lace trimmings.” The collector returned the goods for duty under paragraph 143 0 of the Tariff Act of 1922, at 75 per centum ad valorem. In answer to the protest thereafter filed by the importers, the appraiser reported as follows:

The merchandise marked “A” consists of corsets and lace trimmings for same packed in the same case. It was returned for duty as entireties at 75 per centum, paragraph 1430. It should…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. United States v. SchoverlingSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. United States v. IrwinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1897
  3. Denike v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1914
  4. United States v. Auto Import Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1909
  5. Jackson Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by75 opinions

  1. Donalds Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1954
  2. Ross Products, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1959
  3. United States v. WanamakerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1929
  4. Astra Trading Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
  5. James Betesh Import Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1958

70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API