Legal Opinion

Miller Harness Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided July 6, 1967No. C.D. 3053PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BeckwoRti-i, Judge:

The merchandise involved in this case consists of horse currycombs, imported from Finland, and entered at the port of New York on June 15, 1962. They were assessed with duty at 2½ cents each and 17 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 1537 (c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the Sixth Protocol of Supplementary Concessions to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, 91 Treas. Dec. 150, T.D. 54108, as combs of whatever material composed, except metal or compounds of cellulose, not specially provided for. The claim presently relied upon is that the merchandise is…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ross Products, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1961
  2. Weather-Rite Sportswear Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1962
  3. Canada Dry Ginger Ale, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1959
  4. McCoy v. HeddenU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1889

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Mattel, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970
  2. F. B. Vandegrift & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970
  3. Rettinger Raincoat Mfg. Co. v. The United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1970
  4. Sumitomo Shoji New York, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1975
  5. Los Angeles Tile Jobbers, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API