Diamond Trading Co. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Nichols, Judge:
The merchandise involved in this case, described on the invoice as “Beach Mats (Floor Covering Grass Mats),” was imported from Japan and entered at the port of Honolulu on August 10, 1961. It was assessed with duty at 12% per centum ad valorem under paragraph 1537(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the Protocol of Terms of Accession by Japan to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, T.D. 53865, supplemented by T.D. 53877, as manufactures in chief value of grass. It is claimed to be dutiable at 1% cents per square yard under the provision in paragraph 1021 of said…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Pacific Guano & Fertilizer Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927
- Weather-Rite Sportswear Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1962
- Katz v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1940
- S. S. Kresge Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1952
- United States v. Stern Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Border Brokerage Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970
- Voss Int. Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968
- American Customs Brokerage Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
- International Artware Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1971
- National Silver Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1971