Hawaiian Motor Co. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
RicharbsoN, Judge:
The merchandise in this action., described on commercial invoices as “Xenoah” BCD brush cutters, was exported from Japan in 1975, and classified in liquidation upon entry at Los Angeles, Calif., under TSUS item 674.70 as modified by T.D. 68-9 as hand-directed or -controlled tools with pneumatic or self-contained nonelectric motor, and parts thereof, other, at the duty rate of 4.5 per centum ad valorem. The plaintiff-importer claims that the merchandise is property classifiable under TSUS item 666.00 as hay or grass mowers (except lawnmowers) or as agricultural and…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- United States v. CitroenSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Carrington Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1974
- Theo. H. Davies & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1973
3Cited by9 opinions
- Hawaiian Motor Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1980
- Holly Stores, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1981
- Associated Consumers v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1983
- Shaw Industries, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1982
- Childcraft Education Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1983
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.