Legal Opinion

Hawaiian Motor Co. v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided March 13, 1980No. C.A.D. 1241; No. 79-27PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Rich, Judge.

This appeal is from the judgment of the U.S. Customs Court in Hawaiian Motor Company v. United States, 82 Cust. Ct. 70, C.D. 4790, 473 F. Supp. 787 (1979), sustaining the classification of imported merchandise by the U.S. Customs Service as hand-directed or controlled tools with pneumatic or self-contained, nonelectric motor, and parts thereof. We affirm.

The Merchandise

The imported merchandise consists of a 22.5-cubic-centimeter dis placement gasoline engine, stand, tool kit, and two blades packed in one carton, and a drive shaft packed separately in another carton. It is…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Volkswagen of America, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1972
  2. Hawaiian Motor Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1979

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. E.M. Chemicals v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
  2. United States v. Standard Surplus Sales, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1981
  3. E.M. Chemicals v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1989
  4. United States v. Standard Surplus SalesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1981
  5. The West Bend Company, Division of Dart Industries, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API