Shaw Industries, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
1Opinion of the Court
Landis, Judge:
This action is before the court for decision on stipulated facts, both plaintiffs and defendant having filed briefs. Plaintiffs have argued to reclassify certain merchandise known as the Superba TVP yarn processing machines (Superba). Defendant filed a brief in response to plaintiffs argument and plaintiffs filed a brief in reply thereto. The court signed and ordered filed the stipulation of facts relating to the imported merchandise.
The pertinent statutory provisions, found in the Tariff Schedules of the United States (TSUS) Schedule 6, Part 4, Subpart E, are as follows:
Schedule…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Andrus v. AllardSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Ameliotex, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1977
- Hawaiian Motor Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1980
- United States v. H. Rosenthal Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1979
- Hawaiian Motor Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1979
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Shaw Industries, Inc., Mohasco Corporation, Queen Carpet Corporation, and Tice Yarns v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Clairol, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1984