Associated Consumers v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
1Opinion of the Court
Watson, Judge:
This case involves the classification of imported merchandise described as “Vise Grips” on the invoice. The merchandise was classified as wrenches under item 648.97 1 of the Tariff Schedules of the United States (TSUS) and assessed with duty at the rate of 10.8 percent ad valorem. Plaintiff contends that the merchandise should be classified as pliers under item 648.85 TSUS,2 or alternatively, as clamps under Item 649.37 TSUS.3 Under either one of plaintiffs claimed classifications, the items would be entitled to duty-free treatment under the Generalized System of Preferences.
The…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- The United States v. New York Merchandise Co., Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1970
- Schott Optical Glass, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1979
- E. Green & Son (New York), Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1971
- Wilson's Customs Clearance, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
- Davis Products, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Irwin Industrial Tool Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2019
- Irwin Industrial Tool Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2017