Legal Opinion

Theo. H. Davies & Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided January 12, 1973No. C.D. 4399PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Kao, Judge:

The merchandise involved in this case consists of crawler-mounted machinery manufactured by Bucyrus-Erie Co. of Canada, Ltd., entered at the port of Hilo, Hawaii, on April 9, 1969. It is described on the invoice as follows:

Model 25-B Clamshell, comb. 60-10, Series III

Unit LB-c: 40' Boom, 8 part continuous suspension (1-5' insert)

Unit 13: Boom Stop

*6Unit 18: Swing Brake

Unit 78(a): Cat D-7 tractor type mtg. w/26" single grouser treads

Unit 79(B) : 850# Counterweight

Unit 56: Signal Horn

Single Stick Clamshell Control

Knockdown Method “C”

The purchase order (exhibit 1) denominates the unit…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Pacific Guano & Fertilizer Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927
  2. Catton, Neill & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1922
  3. Border Brokerage Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970
  4. W. A. Gleeson v. The United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1970
  5. A. N. Deringer, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1962

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hawaiian Motor Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1979
  2. Pistorino & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1978
  3. Leaf Brands, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API