Legal Opinion

Childcraft Education Corp. v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided April 15, 1983No. Court No. 74-7-01841PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

LANDIS, Judge:

This action involves merchandise known as “Teaching Typewriters”, “Touch to Learn”, and “Touch to Match”, manufactured in Japan and entered at the port of New York between May 28, 1971 and October 1, 1971.

The pertinent statutory provisions are as follows:

Classified

Schedule 7, Part 5, Subpart E

Subpart E headnotes:

2. For the purposes of the tariff schedules, a “toy” is any article chiefly used for the amusement of children or adults.

sfc jfc sfc # *

*1276Item Articles Rate of Duty

Toys, and parts of toys, not specifically provided for:

737.90 Other 21% ad val.

Claimed:

Schedule 6, Part 4,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. The United States v. New York Merchandise Co., Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1970
  2. Hawaiian Motor Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1980
  3. Novelty Import Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968
  4. Globemaster Midwest, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1971
  5. Hawaiian Motor Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1979

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Childcraft Education Corp. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API