Legal Opinion

Nation v. Planters and Mechanics Bank

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 14, 1911No. 1081PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Brror from Oklahoma County Court; Sam Hooker, Judge. Action by W. E. Nation against the Planters and Mechanics Bank. From the judgment, plaintiff brings error. Cross-petition by defendant.

1Opinion of the Court

DUNN, J.,

This case presents error from vne county court of Oklahoma county, having been begun on January 16, 1908, by W. E. Nation, as plaintiff, against-the defendant in error, to recover $350 damages for the value of two black mares alleged to have been converted by the defendant. The plaintiff claimed to own or have a special interest in the property by virtue of a certain chattel mortgage on the animals, executed October 5, 1907, by one W. H. West, and filed for record October 11, 1907. He alleged that while his mortgage was still unsatisfied, on or about the first of January, 190S, he…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Stewart v. BalderstonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1872
  2. Creek Land & Improvement Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  3. Smith v. McCarthySupreme Court of Kansas · 1888
  4. Tolbert v. HortonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
  5. Fanson v. LinsleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1878

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Consolidated Flour Mills Co. v. MueggeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
  2. Hazlett v. WilkinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  3. Gutensohn v. McGuirtSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
  4. Owens v. State Ex Rel. MotherseadSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  5. Mullendore v. Minnehoma Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API