Hazlett v. Wilkin
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Oklahoma County; W. R. Taylor, Judge. Action by R. L. Wilkin against C. W. Hazlett and others. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants bring error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
BREWER, C.
The defendant in error, R. L. Wilkin, sued the plaintiffs in error, C. W. Hazlett, and his wife, Caroline, in the district court of Oklahoma county, and asked for judgment on their promissory note in the sum of $2,174 and the foreclosure of a mortgage on certain lots in Oklahoma City. In their last amended answer the defendants admit the execution of the note and mortgage, and then for further defense and for their cross-petition allege that the note and mortgage' had been procured through the fraud and deceit of plaintiff, and because of certain false and fraudulent…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- First Nat. Bank of Lawton v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Nation v. Planters and Mechanics BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad v. BradfordSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1907
3Cited by20 opinions
- Nowka v. WestSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
- Hansen v. HolmbergOregon Supreme Court · 1945
- Derdyn v. LowSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Hall v. EdgeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
- Reger v. HenrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.