Legal Opinion
Consolidated Flour Mills Co. v. Muegge
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided September 13, 1927No. 16959, 16960 and 16961, ConsolidatedPublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
I-IALL, C.
The plaintiff in error in these cases was defendant in the court below, and the defendants in error were plaintiffs. For convenience they will be referred to in this opinion as they appeared in the trial court. Occasionally, herein,the defendant will be referred to as “company.”
Briefly the facts are as follows: The defendant was and is a foreign corporation incorporated under the laws of the state of Kansas, with its principal offices at Hutchinson in that state. The defendant was the owner and operator of an extensive chain of flour mills located in that state. It was also the…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- International Harvester Co. of America v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co. of Texas v. AlexanderSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance v. SpratleySupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Railroad Company v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- New York, Lake Erie & Western Railroad v. EstillSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Washington Ex Rel. Bond & Goodwin & Tucker, Inc. v. Superior Court of Wash. for Spokane Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Steinway v. Majestic Amusement Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1950
- Mark Suesz v. Med-1 Solutions, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
- Southern Pacific Railroad Co. of Mexico v. GonzalezArizona Supreme Court · 1936
- Wills v. National Mineral Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.