Fanson v. Linsley
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from Clay District Court. All necessary facts, pleadings, and proceedings are set forth in the opinion. Linsley, as plaintiff, had judgment at tbe November Term 1876 of the district court, and defendant Fanson brings the case here on error.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Valentine, J.:
Statement of the case. This action was commenced in a justice’s court, and after judgment, was appealed to the district court. The plaintiff’s bill of particulars reads as follows:
Clay Center, Clay Co., Kas., Sept. 18, 1876.
A. Fanson, Dr. To Chas. E. Linsley:
For work and labor performed, repairing and running a steam threshing machine, from Aug. 20th 1876 to Sept. 10th 1876, 18 days’ work, at $2 per day, . . $36.00
Cr., cash,.........$5.00
Balance due,........31.00
The defendant’s amended bill of particulars, after the title, reads as…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Stewart v. BalderstonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1872
- Norden v. JonesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1873
- Read v. JeffriesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1876
- Stevens v. AbleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1875
3Cited by27 opinions
- Ablah v. EymanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1961
- Howard v. SwiftIllinois Supreme Court · 1934
- Challis v. HartloffSupreme Court of Kansas · 1933
- Miller v. Oklahoma State Bank of AltusSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Ericson v. CharlesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1921
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.