Legal Opinion

State v. Mueller

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 12, 1888PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal by defendant from an order of tbe district court for Hennepin county, Young, J., presiding, refusing a new trial.

1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.

The defendant was indicted for selling a quantity of malt liquor, to wit, one glass of beer, to one Murray, a minor. It appeared from the evidence that, on the evening of the day alleged in the indictment, Murray, a boy of 16, with three other boys, went into defendant’s saloon or beer-hall, where they remained some three hours or more. The state first introduced evidence tending to show that, after the boys entered, Murray ordered beer for the party, which was furnished them. The state then proceeded, and, under defendant’s objection and exception, introduced evidence that subsequently, but…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. HeckSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1877
  2. State v. MahoneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1876

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. LundgrenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
  2. State v. BurnsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
  3. State v. NugentSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
  4. State v. BrownSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
  5. Peterson v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1927

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API