Legal Opinion

People v. Norcross

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 29, 1925No. Docket Nos. 1096, 1097, 1098PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCraig, J.

The appellants were charged by information with having conspired, combined, and confederated and agreed together to sell, transport, furnish, and deliver, and to have and possess intoxicating liquor, with intent so to do, in violation of the state statute known as the Wright Act; and as overt acts in furtherance of such conspiracy it was alleged that they did on or about the third day of December, 1923, in the county of Los Angeles, sell, furnish, deliver, have, and possess intoxicating liquor, and that the same was willful, felonious, and unlawful. Each of said defendants was also separately…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Havemeyer v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Massey v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1922
  3. Woo Wai v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1915
  4. Dillon v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1921
  5. Albright v. NorthCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Union Oil Associates v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  2. State v. JarvisWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1928
  3. People v. HarrisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
  4. People v. CherryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
  5. People v. PadillaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API