In Re Enstrom

In this disciplinary proceeding, the Administrator for the Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission charged respondent, George Enstrom, with forging an endorsement on a settlement draft, commingling client funds with his own personal funds, and converting a portion of the settlement funds. Specifically, the Administrator asserted that respondent’s conduct violated Rules 9— 102(a) and (c), 1 — 102(a)(4), and 1 — 102(a)(3) of the Code of Professional Responsibility (94 Ill. 2d Rules 9—102(a), (c); 87 Ill. 2d Rules 1—102(a)(4), 1—102(a)(3)). The Hearing Board found that respondent…