Legal Opinion

In Re Gerard

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 1989No. 68434PublishedCited by 56 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stamos

The Administrator of the Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission (the Administrator) filed a one-count complaint charging respondent, William J. Gerard, with charging and collecting an excessive fee, in violation of Rule 2 — 106(a) of the Code of Professional Responsibility (the Code) (107 Ill. 2d R. 2 — 106(a)). The Administrator also charged respondent with the following misconduct arising out of the same factual allegations: conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation in violation of Rule 1 — 102(a)(4) of the Code (107 Ill. 2d R. 1 — 102(a)(4));…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Pocius v. HalvorsenIllinois Supreme Court · 1963
  2. In Re MitanIllinois Supreme Court · 1979
  3. In Re HimmelIllinois Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Majewski v. GallinaIllinois Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Beaton & Associates, Ltd. v. Joslyn Manufacturing & Supply Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1987

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. Havoco of America, Ltd., a Delaware Corporation, Cross-Appellee v. Sumitomo Corporation of America, and Elmer C. Hill, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
  2. Eastern Trading Company v. Refco, Inc., and Refco Capital CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
  3. Anthony Prince v. Rescorp Realty, an Illinois CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
  4. Cripe v. LeiterIllinois Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Mitchell v. Norman James Construction Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1997

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API