Legal Opinion

In Re Clayter

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided January 23, 1980No. 52143PublishedCited by 83 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Ryan

This case presents this court with an opportunity to admonish the bar of this State that it is absolutely impermissible for an attorney to commingle his funds with those of his client or with money he holds as a fiduciary. Unfortunately, many attorneys are either unaware of, or indifferent to, this proscription.

In this disciplinary proceeding the Administrator of the Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission filed a one-count complaint charging the respondent, Richard Leon Clayter, with commingling and conversion of earnest money that had been deposited with him by the parties to a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In Re ShermanIllinois Supreme Court · 1975
  2. In Re AbbamontoIllinois Supreme Court · 1960
  3. In Re BloomIllinois Supreme Court · 1968
  4. In Re LingleIllinois Supreme Court · 1963
  5. In Re WyattIllinois Supreme Court · 1972

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by83 opinions

  1. In Re HopperIllinois Supreme Court · 1981
  2. In Re HimmelIllinois Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Dowling v. Chicago Options Associates, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 2007
  4. In Re FeldmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1982
  5. In Re CheronisIllinois Supreme Court · 1986

78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API