Legal Opinion

In Re Mitan

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided January 12, 1979No. 50594PublishedCited by 62 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Ryan

In this attorney discipline matter we must decide two issues. Is Rule 8.1 of the Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1977, ch. 110A, following par. 770), which states that a hearing shall commence on a complaint within 90 days of service, mandatory or directory? Second, should a licensed attorney who made several false statements on his application for admission to the bar of this State be disciplined and, if so, to what extent?

On February 4, 1976, the Administrator of the Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission filed a complaint, which had been voted…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. In Re Martin-TrigonaIllinois Supreme Court · 1973
  2. People ex rel. Deneen v. GilmoreIllinois Supreme Court · 1905
  3. In Re McCallumIllinois Supreme Court · 1945
  4. In Re HallettIllinois Supreme Court · 1974
  5. In Re CzachorskiIllinois Supreme Court · 1969

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by62 opinions

  1. Attorney General of Maryland v. WaldronCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
  2. People v. PetersonIllinois Supreme Court · 2017
  3. Skolnick v. Altheimer & GrayIllinois Supreme Court · 2000
  4. In Re GerardIllinois Supreme Court · 1989
  5. In Re WigodaIllinois Supreme Court · 1979

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API