In Re Storment
Illinois Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Kilbride
Central to our disposition of this case is the question of whether respondent violated Rule 1.5(g)(2) of the Illinois Rules of Professional Conduct (Code) (134 Ill. 2d R. 1.5(g)(2)) by sharing a fee with another lawyer when respondent was unable to assume the same legal responsibility for the conduct of the case as the lawyer receiving the referral. The Administrator of the Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission (ARDC) filed a complaint charging Paul M. Storment, Jr., respondent, with various violations of the Code. The Hearing Board (Hearing Board or Board) found that respondent…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- In Re Estate of RennickIllinois Supreme Court · 1998
- Eagan v. Chicago Transit AuthorityIllinois Supreme Court · 1994
- In Re VrdolyakIllinois Supreme Court · 1990
- In Re WittIllinois Supreme Court · 1991
- In Re TimponeIllinois Supreme Court · 1993
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Vision Point of Sale, Inc. v. HaasIllinois Supreme Court · 2007
- People v. MarkerIllinois Supreme Court · 2009
- People v. GarsteckiIllinois Supreme Court · 2009
- Ferris, Thompson & Zweig, Ltd. v. EspositoIllinois Supreme Court · 2018
- Peterson v. Berg (In Re Berg)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2008
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.