Legal Opinion

In Re Ushijima

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided November 23, 1987No. 65040PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Simon

The Administrator of the Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission filed a two-count complaint charging the respondent, Michael Masaharu Ushijima, with misappropriation of client funds, and with giving false testimony in a garnishment proceeding in an attempt to conceal that misappropriation. The Hearing Board found that the respondent had inadvertently failed to preserve the identity of client funds but had not converted any funds or knowingly given false testimony. Concluding that the respondent was nevertheless guilty of unprofessional conduct, the Hearing Board recommended that…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. In Re ClayterIllinois Supreme Court · 1980
  2. In Re HopperIllinois Supreme Court · 1981
  3. In Re WigodaIllinois Supreme Court · 1979
  4. In Re LaPinskaIllinois Supreme Court · 1978
  5. In Re KinkIllinois Supreme Court · 1982

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. In Re VrdolyakIllinois Supreme Court · 1990
  2. In Re JohnsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1989
  3. In Re SmithIllinois Supreme Court · 1995
  4. In Re TimponeIllinois Supreme Court · 1993
  5. In Re SpakIllinois Supreme Court · 1999

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API