Legal Opinion
Blue Ridge Insurance v. Puig
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided September 28, 1999No. L-99-558PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
BREDAR, United States Magistrate Judge.
In this diversity action, Blue Ridge Insurance Company (“Plaintiff’ or “insurer”) seeks declaratory relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2201. The insurer has asked this Court to find that it has no duty to defend and indemnify Guy E. Puig (“Defendant” or “insured”) in an underlying tort action pending against him in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City. (Paper No. 1). This action has been referred to the undersigned by consent of the parties for all further proceedings (Paper No. 8), and pending before the Court are cross motions for summary…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Charbonnages De France v. Frank B. Smith, Juanita Smith, Frank Smith, Jr., Smith Brothers Construction Company and Continental Coal Sales CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1979
- Arnold G. Barwick v. The Celotex Corporation, Keene Corporation, Pittsburgh Corning Corporation, H.K. Porter, Forty-Eight Insulations, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1984
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Gruber v. Unum Life Insurance Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2002
- Standard Fire Insurance v. ProctorDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2003
- United States v. RachelDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2003
- Grooman v. Northwestern Mutual Life InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2002
- Ryland Mortgage Co., Inc. v. Travelers Indem. Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 2001
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.