Legal Opinion

United States v. Rachel

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided July 10, 2003No. CIV.A.WMN-02-754PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

NICKERSON, Senior District Judge.

Before the Court are Defendants’ Joint Motion for Sanctions, To Compel, and in Limine (Paper No. 16), Defendants’ Joint Motion for Summary Judgment and Partial Dismissal for Lack of Jurisdiction (Paper No. 17), and the Government’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Paper No. 26). 1 The motions have been fully briefed and are ripe for decision. Upon a review of the pleadings and applicable case law, this Court determines that no hearing is necessary (Local Rule 105.6) and that Defendants’ Joint Motion for Sanctions, To Compel, and in Limine will be denied;…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. United States Ex Rel. Marcus v. HessSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. Taft Broadcasting Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
  4. In re Grand Jury ProceedingsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1984
  5. ITCO Corp. v. Michelin Tire Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1983

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ayers v. Continental Casualty Co.District Court, N.D. West Virginia · 2007
  2. Al-Sabah v. World Business Lenders, LLCDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2024
  3. Portillo v. H Restaurant and Night Club, LLCDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2024
  4. Skapinetz v. CoesterVMS.com, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2021
  5. United States v. Maverick Mktg., LLCUnited States Court of International Trade · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API