Legal Opinion

Grooman v. Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided April 22, 2002No. WMN-01-521PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

NICKERSON, District Judge.

Before the Court are cross motions for summary judgment. Paper Nos. 13 (Defendant’s) and 14 (Plaintiffs). 1 The motions are fully briefed. Upon a review of the motions and the applicable case law, the Court determines that no hearing is necessary and that both motions will be granted in part and denied in part.

I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND

Plaintiff brought this action seeking additional long term disability (LTD) benefits. The case was originally filed in the state court but was removed here by Defendant on the basis that Plaintiffs state law claims were preempted…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Taft Broadcasting Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
  3. Ellen v. Ellis v. Metropolitan Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1997
  4. Holmes v. Pension Plan of Bethlehem Steel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
  5. Brenda Elliott v. Sara Lee CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Aisenberg v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2024
  2. Jones v. USABLE LIFEDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2006
  3. Krysztofiak v. Boston Mutual Life Insurance Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API