Legal Opinion

State v. Eisenbacher

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided May 28, 1985No. C8-85-38PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LESLIE, Judge.

The State appeals from a pretrial order in a prosecution for gross misdemeanor DWI. The order precluded the introduction of statements from an unknown citizen informer as hearsay and overruled a determination made on the same issue at an omnibus hearing. The State contends that the order is incorrect as a matter of law and alternatively, that a ruling on the admissibility of evidence at an omnibus hearing cannot be overruled by the presiding judge at a pretrial hearing. The respondent cross appeals alleging that appellant’s oral notice of intent to use statements in the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. WebberSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  2. City of Mankato v. FetchenhierCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  3. State v. CarlsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  4. State v. PelovskyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  5. State v. HejlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  2. State v. GrohoskiCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  3. State v. SchermerhornCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  4. State v. HendricksonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  5. State v. OthoudtCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API