State v. Othoudt
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RANDALL, Judge.
The trial court was not clearly and unequivocally wrong when it found appellant’s warrantless in-home arrest invalid because the deputy sheriff lacked consent to proceed into respondent’s home and up to his bedroom. We affirm.
FACTS
The law enforcement officer here, a deputy sheriff, was dispatched to the scene of a one vehicle accident. No one was present when he arrived. He deduced that a pickup truck had crossed a lane of traffic, run off the road and hit a tree. There was damage to the front end of the truck and the windshield. There was also spattered blood inside the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Warden, Maryland Penitentiary v. HaydenSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. OthoudtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
- State of Minnesota v. Jose Martin Lugo, Jr.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2016
- State of Minnesota v. Jose Martin Lugo, Jr.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2016