Legal Opinion
State v. Pelovsky
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided May 1, 1984No. C7-83-1905PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WOZNIAK, Judge.
After an omnibus hearing, the trial court . suppressed an incriminating statement made by Karl Pelovsky. The trial was stayed and the State appeals under Minn.R. Crim.P. 28.04(1) (formerly numbered as Minn.R.Crim.P. 29.03(1)). We affirm.
FACTS
The State alleges that Pelovsky has committed Medicare fraud. He is charged with five counts of theft.
Pelovsky owns and operates the Owaton-na Health Care Center, a nursing home in Owatonna, Minnesota. Welfare Department auditors, in a search of the nursing home’s records, detected charges for personal food billed to Medicare. The…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Minnesota v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- State v. WebberSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- State v. HejlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- State v. SchmiegCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- State v. HelenboltSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. Joon Kyu KimSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
- State v. KlineCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- State v. WhelanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- State v. KimCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- State v. EisenbacherCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.