Legal Opinion

State v. Hendrickson

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided November 4, 1986No. C6-86-355PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RANDALL, Judge.

Respondent was arrested and charged with driving while under the influence of alcohol, obstructing legal process, and two traffic violations. Following a pretrial evi-dentiary hearing, the district court dismissed the charge of obstructing legal process. The court suppressed tape recorded statements made by the respondent following her arrest. The trial court also found that respondent had been improperly detained. The State appeals the pretrial order dismissing the charge of obstructing legal process and suppressing the tape recorded statements. We affirm on all issues…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. WebberSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  2. State v. MartinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  3. State v. AarsvoldCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  4. State v. ShawSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  5. State v. OlsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. DiedrichCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
  2. State v. GaultCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
  3. State v. LangCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API