Legal Opinion
State v. Grohoski
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided July 8, 1986No. C5-86-587PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SEDGWICK, Judge.
The state appeals pursuant to Minn.R. Crim.P. 28.04, subd. 1(1) a trial court order suppressing evidence of respondent’s breath test. The state contends the trial court erred in determining a police officer lacked probable cause to invoke the implied consent law. We reverse and remand for trial.
FACTS
At 12:30 a.m. on August 6, 1985 Apple Valley Police Sergeant Merle Lohse observed a motorcycle traveling 74 m.p.h. in a 50 m.p.h. zone. Sergeant Lohse followed as the motorcycle crossed the centerline while negotiating a curve in the road. After stopping the motorcycle,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. WebberSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Holtz v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1983
- Johnson v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- State v. HicksSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
- Martin v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. LaducerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004
- State v. WickernCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
- State of Iowa v. Steven Sherwood BunceCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2014
- State of Tennessee v. Anthony John SilvaCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2016