Legal Opinion

State v. Schermerhorn

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided January 7, 1986No. C4-85-1395PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RANDALL, Judge.

This is an appeal by the State of a pretrial suppression order and a district court order dismissing the complaint.

FACTS

The relevant facts are as follows: At about 1:35 a.m. on March 31, 1985, State Trooper R.W. Steffen was on patrol in Detroit Lakes. Steffen saw the left wheels of respondent’s car cross the center of the roadway. Steffen testified that he saw respondent make a wide left turn. The officer then made a U-turn and followed Schermerhorn.

Steffen said respondent drove close to the right curb instead of in the center, more travelled portion, of the road.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. WebberSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  2. State v. WollanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  3. State v. EisenbacherCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  4. City of Rochester v. StevensSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. JonesWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1987
  2. State v. PalmerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2008
  3. State v. Batzer Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
  4. In re the Welfare of W.L.H.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API