Legal Opinion
Reed v. Collins
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 6, 1907No. Civ. No. 318PublishedCited by 11 opinions
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.
Plaintiffs obtained judgment in the court below, granting a peremptory writ of mandate to compel the defendants, as members of and constituting the board of supervisors of Mariposa county, to issue to said plaintiffs a license to traffic within the limits of said county in the retail liquor business.
The defendants appeal from the judgment, upon the judgment-roll alone.
The plaintiffs made application for said license in accordance with the provisions of an ordinance, adopted by said board of supervisors on the fourth day of January, 1900, and designated and known as “Ordinance No. 73.” This…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Crowley v. ChristensenSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Ex parte ChristensenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Ex parte CampbellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Henry v. BartonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
3Cited by11 opinions
- Fascination, Inc. v. HooverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Laurelle v. BushCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911
- Martin v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
- Felice v. City of InglewoodCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- People v. NoggleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.