Legal Opinion

Henry v. Barton

California Supreme Court

Decided June 27, 1895No. 19477PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Bernardino County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtGaroutte, J.

Respondent in the trial court secured a judgment of mandate against Barton and others, trustees of the city of San Bernardino, requiring them, as such trustees, to issue to him a retail liquor license. This is an appeal prosecuted from such judgment. It is provided by ordinance of that city that “ for every saloon, bar, or place where spirituous, vinous, etc., liquors are sold or given away in less quantities than one quart, a license tax of fifty dollars a month is imposed.” It is further provided that any person desirous of engaging in such business must make written application to the…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Inglin v. HoppinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Co-Operative Junk Co. v. Board of Police CommissionersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918
  3. Reed v. CollinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907
  4. City of Montpelier v. MillsIndiana Supreme Court · 1908

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API