Legal Opinion
Ex parte Campbell
California Supreme Court
Decided October 31, 1887No. 20324PublishedCited by 22 opinions
Application for a writ of habeas corpus. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.-
1Opinion of the CourtPaterson, J.
The petitioner is before us on a writ of habeas corpus to test the validity of an ordinance of the city of Pasadena, duly passed, approved, and published, for a violation of which he has been duly convicted. The ordinance was passed February 19, 1887, and took effect on the first Monday in May, 1887. The following provisions only are germane to the matter before us: —
“ Sec. 1. It shall be and is hereby made unlawful for any person or persons, either as owner, principal, agent, servant, or employee, to establish, open, keep, maintain, *21or carry on, or assist in carrying on, within the corporate…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Thurlow v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1847
- Beer Co. v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Wynehamer v. . the PeopleNew York Court of Appeals · 1856
- Bartemeyer v. IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Bertholf v. . O'ReillyNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Pasadena Sch. Dist. v. City of PasadenaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- State v. ClarkIdaho Supreme Court · 1965
- In re O'BrienMontana Supreme Court · 1904
- People v. VelardeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
- Ex Parte RoachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.